1932

Abstract

The reviews in Volume 64 of the cover diverse topics. A common theme in many of the reviews is the interindividual variability in the clinical response to drugs. Highlighted areas include emerging developments in pharmacogenomics that can predict the personal risk for drug inefficacy and/or adverse drug reactions. Other reviews focus on the use of circulating biomarkers to define drug metabolism phenotypes and the effect of circadian regulation on drug response. Another emerging technology, digital twins that model individual patients, is used to generate computational simulations of drug effects and identify optimal personalized treatments. Another variable that may affect clinical outcomes, the nocebo response (an adverse reaction to a placebo), complicates clinical trials. These reviews further document that pharmacological individuality is an essential component of the concepts of personalized medicine and precision medicine and will likely have an important impact on patient care.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-090123-010552
2024-01-23
2024-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pharmtox/64/1/annurev-pharmtox-090123-010552.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-090123-010552&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Schork NJ. 2015. Personalized medicine: time for one-person trials. Nature 520:609–11
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Pirmohamed M. 2023. Pharmacogenomics: current status and future perspectives. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24:350–62
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Lauschke VM, Zhou Y, Ingelman-Sundberg M 2024. Pharmacogenomics beyond single common genetic variants: the way forward. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:33–51
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Corpas M, Siddiqui MK, Soremekum O, Mathur R, Gill D, Fatumo S. 2024. Addressing ancestry and sex bias in pharmacogenomics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:53–64
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Khamsi R. 2022. The quest for an all-inclusive human genome. Nature 603:378–81
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Tremmel R, Hofmann U, Haag M, Schaeffeler E, Schwab M. 2024. Circulating biomarkers instead of genotyping to establish metabolizer phenotypes. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:65–87
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Darwich AS, Polasek TM, Aronson JK, Ogunbenro K, Wright DFB et al. 2021. Model-informed precision dosing: background, requirements, validation, implementation, and forward trajectory of individualizing drug therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 61:225–45
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Lévi FA, Okyar A, Hadadi E, Innominato PF, Ballesta A. 2024. Circadian regulation of drug responses: towards sex-specific and personalized chronotherapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:89–114
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Reinberg A, Halberg F. 1971. Circadian chronopharmacology. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 11:455–92
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Levi F, Schibler U. 2007. Circadian rhythms: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 47:593–628
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Reinberg AE 1992. Concepts of chronopharmacology. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 32:51–66
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Paschos GK, Baggs JE, Hogenesch JB, FitzGerald GE. 2010. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 50:187–214
  13. 13.
    Levi F, Okyar A, Dulong S, Innominato PF, Clairambault J. 2010. Circadian timing in cancer treatments. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 50:377–421
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Dallmann R, Brown SA, Gachon F. 2014. Chronopharmacology: new insights and therapeutic implications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 54:339–61
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Cejas RB, Petrykey K, Sapkota Y, Burridge PW. 2024. Anthracycline toxicity: light at the end of the tunnel?. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:115–34
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Tasdighi E, Adhikari R, Almaadawy O, Leucker TM, Blaha MJ. 2024. LP(a): structure, genetics, associated cardiovascular risk, and emerging therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:135–57
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Venkatesh KP, Brito G, Kamel Boulos MN. 2024. Health digital twins in life science and health care innovation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:159–70
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Colloca L. 2024. The nocebo effect. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64:171–90
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-090123-010552
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error